NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

first instance Learn more about first instance

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about first instance for you across the entire web.

• 

  Lost! Court final judgment: Tesla sales fraud "return one for one compensation"

  Tesla was sued by the car owner for "suspected sales fraud". The court finally ruled that Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd. lost the case and needed to return the car at the original price and compensate the owner for the purchase of 778200 yuan. According to the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability dispute of Li Zhilong and Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, the party Li Zhilong (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Li") spent 778200 yuan to buy Tesla Model X, and later found that the car had inconsistent model certificates of drive motors, so Mr. Li sold Tesla cars (Wenzhou).

  Tesla 2021-06-22
• 

  Award a compensation of 7 million! Geely v. Weimar won the first instance of infringement of trade secrets

  After four years, Geely Motor and Weimar Automobile infringement of trade secrets case finally ushered in new progress. According to reports, the Shanghai higher people's Court has made a first-instance judgment on Geely and Weimar's 2.1 billion yuan intellectual property dispute, and the judgment of the first instance of the case was issued in September.

  Automobile Weimar Geely Group drawings case Court dispute Shanghai judgment holding first instance Trade Trade Secret Secret 2022-12-26
• 

  Compensation of 300000! Weilai announced the verdict of first instance in the infringement case of "Automobile discipline"

  Claim 2 million! The verdict of first instance was issued in the case in which Weilai sued Douyin Da V "Automobile discipline". Today, the Ministry of legal Affairs of Weilai said in a post on its official Weibo that it had received a judgment of first instance from the court that "car discipline", one of the online accounts controlled by Shanghai ladder Information Technology Co., Ltd., had been released to the top for 30 consecutive days.

  Video price information model Norway infringement judgment fact act content malice automobile legal affairs legal department litigation 2023-07-28
• 

  BMW caught fire while driving, and the owner sued for 190000 yuan.

  Recently, the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability disputes of Guangzhou Baoyue Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., BMW (China) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, rejected the above and upheld the original verdict. this judgment is final. The course of the case: in March 2011, Xiao bought a BMW off-road vehicle in Guangzhou Baoyue for 709000 yuan. in the subsequent use process, the plaintiff used the vehicle according to the vehicle manual and maintained it regularly. In September 2018, the car suddenly smoked and caught fire while driving on the road, and was finally burned into an empty shell. In October 2018,.

  BMW 2021-08-22
• 

  The latest result of the one-for-three refund case: Tesla's application for retrial was rejected

  Today, Mr. Han, a party to Tesla's "withdrawal of one indemnity for three" case, said in a personal Weibo post: the Beijing Municipal higher people's Court has ruled in accordance with the law to reject Tesla's application for retrial, and the case has been finally concluded for more than three years. Reviewing the related events, the car owner, Mr. Han, spent 379700 yuan on Tesla Guan.com in 2019.

  Tex Tesla vehicle company Hanxian car owner first instance accident court judgment reputation right of reputation case Beijing structure 2023-03-28
• 

  GAC Honda accepted bribes during his tenure as executive vice president and was sentenced to seven and a half years in the first instance.

  According to relevant media, the Guangzhou Intermediate people's Court disclosed the legal documents of Fu Shoujie, former chairman of Guangzhou Wanli Group Co., Ltd. And executive deputy general manager of Guangzhou Automobile Honda Motor Co., Ltd., on suspicion of accepting bribes. As a result, from the report by the masses in March 2018 to the publication of the judgment of the first instance, the bribery case of Fu Shoujie has finally been settled. The judgment shows that from 2006 to 2017, Fu Shoujie illegally accepted bribes totaling 10.72 million yuan during his tenure as executive deputy general manager, chairman of Honda, director of Mitsubishi, executive deputy general manager and chairman of Guangzhou Wanli Group. One trial.

  Guangzhou Automobile 2019-08-23
• 

  The second-hand Mercedes-Benz sold as a new car, and the rights court ordered the car dealer to pay 3.35 million yuan in compensation for two years.

  The imported second-hand Mercedes-Benz was sold as a new car, and the court ruled that there was no compensation at first instance. After the car owner appealed and provided strong evidence, the final seller was awarded 3.35 million yuan in compensation. Recently, the China Consumer Daily, which is in charge of the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration and sponsored by the China Consumer Association, disclosed the incident of protecting the rights of Mercedes-Benz owners. On November 1, 2017, Mr. Liang signed a "car sales contract" with Shenzhen Qianxing Technology Company to buy a black 17 Mercedes-Benz GLS 450 with a net price of 1.117 million yuan (excluding vehicle license fees). On the day of signing the contract, Mr. Liang Qianxing Technology Company paid a deposit.

  Automobile sales 2020-03-31
• 

  Great Wall Motor won the first instance by self-media hacking "toxic" vilification case.

  Today, Great Wall Motor officially released an article and video about a company using multiple self-media platforms to say that "Great Wall VV7 is' toxic 'and harmful to formaldehyde", seriously damaging Great Wall Motor's goodwill, so Great Wall Motor went through legal means. After the judgment, the first instance ruled that the company should delete the relevant content of Great Wall Motor and make compensation. According to official sources, in June 2017, Sumi Weishang released the title "Great Wall VV7 is poisonous" on its official Wechat account, Weibo, Sohu Video, Auto account, Ika Automobile Forum, Leeco, Pacific Network and other platforms.

  Great Wall Motor 2020-01-21
• 

  Volkswagen Touareg "Watergate" incident: three car owners were awarded compensation ranging from 63 to 680000 yuan in the first instance.

  According to relevant media reports, 48 owners of imported Touareg cars sued Volkswagen (China) sales Co., Ltd. (later known as Volkswagen) in the Watergate incident. The Chaoyang Court of first instance found that Volkswagen's announcement on the description of product design defects was unclear and inaccurate, and ordered it to truthfully inform 48 car owners of vehicle design defects. Mr. Lan and other three car owners due to damage to the vehicle engine, the court at its discretion ordered Volkswagen to compensate three owners with damages ranging from 630000 yuan to 680000 yuan, and the three owners returned the vehicle to Volkswagen. The other 45 car owners didn't actually happen because the car didn't happen.

  Volkswagen ten thousand yuan car owner 2019-07-29
• 

  Land Rover accuses Jiangling of turning defeat into victory! Lu Feng X7 plagiarized range Rover Aurora Patent was ruled invalid

  On December 16, 2019, the Supreme people's Court of the people's Republic of China rejected the second-instance retrial application of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd., upholding the second-instance judgment of the Beijing Supreme people's Court, according to the China referee Writing website. Lu Feng X7 was found to have copied the aurora design of Land Rover. Range Rover Aurora made its debut at the 2010 Guangzhou Motor Show, while Jiangling Holdings' Lufeng X7 made its debut at the 2014 Guangzhou Motor Show. The biggest highlight of the Land Wind X7 is its appearance, because the Land Wind X7 is highly similar to the Land Rover Aurora, and the price is much cheaper than the Land Rover Aurora.

  Land wind X7 2020-01-09
• 

  Tesla won the final case of "chip reduction", and the car owner's request for "core change" was rejected.

  On March 2, 2020, a car owner Tesla posted on Weibo that the configuration of the upgraded after-drive version of the domestic standard Model 3 had been downgraded and that the car was equipped with a vehicle controller code-named 1462554 (FSD chip HW3.0), but when the owner removed the vehicle controller, he found it was code-named 1465773 (FSD chip HW2.5). Compared with the HW2.5 chip, the computing power of the HW3.0 chip is 21 times higher than that of the HW2.5 chip.

  Tesla 2021-08-06
• 

  A public apology and a compensation of 5 million! Dongfeng Co., Ltd. won the lawsuit against Beijing car thousands of miles away.

  On August 25, the official account "NI+ Planet" on Dongfeng Nissan announced that Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. won over Beijing Auto Qianli Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "che Qianli"). Dongfeng Nissan in "Justice will not be absent!" Dongfeng Co., Ltd. v. Beijing che Qianli Internet infringement case won the second instance, "the article said:"

  Dongfeng Company Limited Qianli Co. Ltd. Automobile Dongfeng Automobile judgment Video Qijun second instance Laboratory Bull cart account experiment 2023-08-25
• 

  Tesla responded to the Big V dispute case: the judgment of first instance apologized to Tesla. The Shanghai Auto Show incident is still under trial.

  Tesla responded to a reputation dispute with Weibo user "Yan Chuang" in a post on Weibo on Aug. 28. Tesla said that recently, we have noticed that Mr. Yan posted on Weibo the relevant contents of the reputation dispute with Tesla, which attracted everyone's attention. In order to let the majority of netizens know the truth, I would like to talk about the relevant situation.

  Tess Tesla Honor Mr. reputation right judgment user dispute Auto Show Brake Law China event Shanghai matter 2023-08-28
• 

  Admitting to fabricating "brake failure", Wenzhou Tesla lost control of the car owner publicly apologized

  The closely watched "Wenzhou Tesla brake failure" incident ushered in the latest progress. On May 9, a blogger named "Mobile user 3042983165" posted an apology letter on the social platform: "admitting to fabricating the truth is stepping on the wrong pedal". In the apology letter, the blogger said: he is 2020.

  Tesi Tesla car owner sir madam judgment company brake Wenzhou accident vehicle first instance platform incident second instance 2022-05-10
• 

  The BMW hybrid car fire was found to be a quality problem, and the car owner received a compensation of 400000 yuan.

  The man sued brilliance BMW and its dealers for spontaneous combustion when he bought a BMW hybrid, and finally got 400000 yuan in compensation. According to the judge's documents, Wang bought a BMW hybrid car on October 23, 2019, with a total price tax of 426780 yuan, of which the vehicle purchase tax was 49098.

  BMW seat fire vehicle quality court brilliance trace car cause Qingdao Qingdao investigation driving identification 2022-08-17
• 

  The Tuge car has been fully recovered and the office address has been vacated.

  Since November last year, Tuge shared cars have been frequently reported as delinquent deposits by users, and the record of 1500 yuan deposit in APP has disappeared. Previously, the official customer service responded that the fault would be repaired in the near future, but at present, the Tuge hotline has indicated that "there is no such business number", all the shared cars in the parking lots have been removed, and the company's office address has been emptied. Industry and commerce responded that Tuge did not go bankrupt. It is understood from the relevant channels that the Beijing Court trial Information Network has intensively made public 82 judgments of Beijing Tuge Technology Co., Ltd., all of which are lease contract disputes arising from the failure to refund the deposit on time. Among the judgments made public in June this year, 41 were judgments of first instance.

  Automobile 2019-06-19
• 

  It is not a unique instance, but has its counterpart! This Mercedes-Benz 4S store doesn't know the origin of the engine.

  one

  Mercedes Benz 2019-11-22
• 

  Tesla sued goods to play the final victory! Product play: will be submitted for retrial

  On June 13th, Pinplay issued a statement on its official Weibo on the verdict of the second instance in Tesla's case. The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate people's Court has made a final judgment on the infringement of reputation by Beijing Pinci Interactive Technology Co., Ltd., the operator of Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., the statement said.

  Tesi Tesla judgment company court article limited limited Shanghai reputation official platform people's court people reputation right 2023-06-13
• 

  Verdict! Tesla returns one to three!

  The owner, Mr. Han, reflected in Tesla's online purchase of a Tesla officially certified second-hand car, Model S P85, and was told by the sales before purchase that there were no major accidents, blisters, fires and structural damage in the Tesla certified car, but Mr. Han always found some minor problems in the car and needed to frequently go to the Tesla service center for repair. after passing the third-party inspection, the vehicle C-pillar and rear wing were cut and welded. Tesla was sued in anger. Since the protection of his rights in August 19, Mr. Han has waited for the court's ruling: return one to three. Today, Han, the owner of Tesla, said in a post, "I won the case, Beijing No.2 Middle Court Wei."

  Tesla 2021-09-17
• 

  The second trial upheld the original verdict! Tesla wins the lawsuit against "5 million fans of Douyin".

  The result of the judgment of the second instance was announced, and the result of the judgment was upheld, and the judgment was final. In other words, this case ended in Tesla's victory. In June 2022, Tesla sued "Boss Cai" for infringement of reputation. On October 31 of the same year, the result of the first instance of the case was announced, and the judgment showed that the court recognized

  Boss Tess Tesla video judgment platform company content friend case court result infringement second instance event 2023-03-14